Sec. 146.95 Methods of attribution.
(a) Producibility.--(1) General. A subzone operator must attribute
the source of each final product. The operator is limited in this regard
to feedstocks which were eligible for attribution during the current or
prior manufacturing period. Attribution of final products is allowable
to the extent that the quantity of such products could have been
produced from such feedstocks, using the industry standards of potential
production on a practical operating basis, as published in T.D. 66-16.
Once attribution is made for a particular product, that attribution is
binding. Subsequent attributions of feedstock to product must take prior
attributions into account. Each refiner shall keep records showing each
attribution.
(2) Industry standards of potential production. The industry
standards of potential production on a practical operating basis
necessary for the producibility attribution method are
[[Page 115]]
contained in tables published in T.D. 66-16. With these tables, a
subzone operator may attribute final products consumed in, or removed
from, the subzone to feedstocks during the current or a prior
manufacturing period.
(3) Attribution to product or feedstock not listed in T.D. 66-16.
(i) For purposes of attribution, where a final product or a feedstock is
not listed in T.D. 66-16, the operator must submit a proposed
attribution schedule, supported by a technical memorandum, to the
appropriate port director. The port director shall refer the request to
the Director, Office of Regulatory Audit (``ORA''), who will verify the
refiner's records and will coordinate with the Director, Office of
Laboratories and Scientific Services (``OLSS''). The Director, ORA,
shall either approve or deny the request. If the request is approved,
the Director, ORA, shall publish a modification of T.D. 66-16. If an
operator elects to show attribution on a producibility basis, but fails
to keep records on that basis, the operator shall use its actual
operating records to determine attribution and any necessary relative
value calculation upon the Customs Service demand and subject to
verification.
(ii) An operator may attribute a final product to a feedstock in
excess of the amount allowed under T.D. 66-16, when authorized by
Customs, without losing the ability to attribute under T.D. 66-16 for
all other feedstock-final product combinations. The operator must use
its actual production records for the requested feedstock-final product
combination. The operator must agree in writing that it will not, and it
will not enable any other person, to file a drawback claim under 19
U.S.C. 1313 inconsistent with those actual production records for that
feedstock-final product combination. The operator shall file its request
in accordance with paragraph (a)(3) of this section. The Director, ORA,
and the Director, OLSS, must determine whether T.D. 66-16 needs to be
modified and shall publish in the Customs Bulletin each approval granted
under this paragraph and request public comments with each such
approval.
(4) Attribution to privileged foreign feedstock; relative value. If
a final product is attributed to the separation of a privileged foreign
feedstock a relative value must be assigned (see section IV of the
appendix to this part).
(b) Refinery operating records. An operator may use the actual
refinery operating records to attribute the feedstocks used to the
removed or consumed products. Customs shall accept the operator's
operating conventions to the extent that the operator demonstrates that
it actually uses these conventions in its refinery operations. Whatever
conventions are elected by the operator, they must be used consistently
in order to be acceptable to Customs. Additionally, Customs may use
these records to test the validity of admissions into the subzone,
consumption within and removals from the subzone.
Example. If the operator mixes three equal quantities of material in
a day tank and treats that product as a three-part mixture in its
production unit, Customs will accept the resulting product as composed
of the three materials. If, in the alternative, the operator assumes
that the three products do not mix and treats the first product as being
composed of the first material put into the day tank, the second product
as composed of the second material put into the day tank, and the third
product as being composed of the third material put into the day tank,
Customs will accept that convention also.